Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
  Home | About Us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Contact | Advertise | Submission | Login 
Users Online: 550 
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layoutHome Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 66-70

Effectiveness of bifrontal ECT in practice: A comparison with bitemporal ECT


National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Jagadisha Thirthalli
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Hosur Road, Bangalore - 560 029, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0253-7176.85398

Rights and Permissions

Background: Bifrontal (BF) placement of electrodes in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has emerged as an alternative option to the conventional bitemporal (BT) and right unilateral electrode placement in view of fewer cognitive adverse effects. However, the results have been contradictory in terms of clinical efficacy. Materials and Methods: We studied the records of all patients referred for ECT between the months of August 2008 and July 2010 (n=1575). One hundred and five of these patients had received BF-ECT. These records were compared with the records of 105 patients who received BT-ECT. For each patient who received BF-ECT, the very next person posted for BT-ECT was taken as the control. All patients received bilateral ECTs at 1.5-times the threshold stimulus dose. The number of ECTs administered, duration of hospital stay after ECT initiation, seizure threshold and failure to achieve adequate seizures were compared. Two raters who achieved good inter-rater reliability assessed the initial severity using the clinical global impression scale and clinical improvement using a Likert scale. Results: The speed of response, as assessed by the number of ECTs received and the duration of hospital stay after ECT initiation was similar in the two groups. In addition, both groups were comparable in terms of clinical improvement scores on the Likert scale. BF-ECT patients also had a significantly higher seizure threshold, which remained significant in spite of controlling for age. This study is chart based, with its inherent limitations. Standard outcome measures were not used. Cognitive adverse effects were not studied. Conclusions: BF-ECT performed similar to BT-ECT with regard to therapeutic efficacy. Given the consistent results of the former, with fewer cognitive side-effects, the findings of the present study support BF-ECT as the first line for electrode application.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1678    
    Printed137    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded58    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal