|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 304-307
The relationships between self-efficacy, internet addiction and shame
Giuseppe Craparo1, Roberta Messina1, Sergio Severino1, Silvia Fasciano1, Vincenza Cannella2, Alessio Gori3, Marco Cacioppo1, Roberto Baiocco4
1 Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy
2 CIPA Meridionale, Italy
3 University of Florence, Florence, Italy
4 Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
|Date of Web Publication||26-Jun-2014|
Dr. Giuseppe Craparo
Kore University of Enna, Cittadella Universitaria, Enna 94100
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Internet addiction (IAD) is one of the most diffuse mental disorders among adolescents. Aims: The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationships between shame, self-efficacy and Internet addiction. Materials and Methods: We recruited a total of 670 college students (males = 164, 24.5%; females = 506, 75.5%). The subjects were aged between 18 and 36 years (M = 20.93, SD = 2.52; males: M = 21.43, SD = 2.95; females: M = 20.76, SD = 2.35). We administered the following instruments: Experience of Shame Scale; Perceived Social Self-Efficacy Scale - Adult Version; Perceived Self-Efficacy in Handling Negative Emotions Scales; Internet Addiction Test. Statistics Analysis: We applied multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA), Pearson's correlation indices and linear regression analysis. Results and Conclusion: We found a significant inter-relation between Internet addiction and shame. Shame could be a good predictor of Internet addiction.
Keywords: Internet addiction, self-efficacy, shame
|How to cite this article:|
Craparo G, Messina R, Severino S, Fasciano S, Cannella V, Gori A, Cacioppo M, Baiocco R. The relationships between self-efficacy, internet addiction and shame. Indian J Psychol Med 2014;36:304-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Craparo G, Messina R, Severino S, Fasciano S, Cannella V, Gori A, Cacioppo M, Baiocco R. The relationships between self-efficacy, internet addiction and shame. Indian J Psychol Med [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Feb 28];36:304-7. Available from: http://www.ijpm.info/text.asp?2014/36/3/304/135386
| Introduction|| |
Internet addiction is conceptualized as an impulse control disorder, similar to gambling behavior. ,, Symptoms of Internet addiction generally include preoccupation, loss of control, high tolerance, withdrawal, craving, impairment of function and a reduction in the ability to make decisions. , The literature has amply demonstrated a high prevalence of psychological and psychiatric problems - such as behavioral, mood, anxiety and impulse control disorders - among Internet dependents. ,,,, Flores  further noted that addiction and substance use in general, performs the function of helping the individual to manage the difficulties associated with interpersonal relationships, but such addiction gradually impairs the individual's already fragile capacity for attachment. Moreover, gender (much more diffuse among males), , excessive hours (>2) per day spent on Internet,  low quality of social relations,  early traumatic experiences,  low academic satisfaction  and accessibility were found to be correlated with Internet addiction.
In addition to the study of the psychological risk factors for Internet Addiction, other areas of study relate to the characteristics of the Internet communication environments. For example, several studies have recently demonstrated that the use of online social networking sites increased risk for Internet addiction in adolescents. ,, Research on social psychology and the Internet has amply demonstrated that computer-mediated communication and general Internet-based behavior can be characterized as containing high levels of self-disclosure. ,, Indeed, many authors argued that the online relational environments (e.g., chats and social networks) allow individuals to be authentic or to experience different identities and personalities in ways that are not possible in face-to-face reality.
Internet addiction: The role of shame and self-efficacy perception
Until date, no studies have examined the conjoint role played by feelings of shame and self-efficacy on abuse of the Internet. In the year 1958, Lynd defined shame as "a wound to one's self-esteem, a painful feeling or sense of degradation excited by the consciousness of having done something unworthy of one's previous idea of one's own excellence." Self-efficacy was defined by Bandura  as the beliefs of people about their ability to attain designed levels of performance and this plays an important role in life satisfaction and with emotional health, decision making, coping with stress and depression. Because self-efficacy addresses the individual's perception of control of life events and is predictive of a person's goals and performance, we hypothesized an association of self-efficacy with Internet overuse and above all, with the loss of control and interference (LCI) with daily life. We have also investigated the role of shame and self-efficacy in the sphere of Internet abuse.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Respondents were eligible to participate in the study if they were 18-36-year-old and Italian college students. Participation was completely voluntary and respondents were not paid for their participation. The instructions stated that the questionnaire was voluntary and that responses were anonymous and confidential. Samples were obtained using a snowballing sampling design: People were approached through advertising or direct contacts and they were then asked to help identify other recruits. Participation was secured through an informed consent procedure that required active consent from participants. This survey was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Commission of the Korea University. The instruments listed below were administered with a separate form that allows the investigator to assess information about gender and age.
We administered the Italian version of the following scales:
Experience of Shame Scale (ESS).  This is a self-report scale composed of 25 items with responses on a four-point Likert scale (1 = "Not at All;" 2 = "A Little;" 3 = "Moderately;" 4 = "Very Much"). The internal reliability of the Italian adaptation of the ESS was assessed. The analysis revealed a good internal consistency (α = 0.93). The median ESS score in the distribution is 45.7 (standard deviation [SD] ± 13.1).
Perceived Social Self-efficacy Scale - Adult Version (ASP/A).  This is a self-report scale composed of 15 items measured on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all capable) to 5 (completely capable). This scale evaluates the degree of ability in establishing good social relationships and asserting one's rights and points of view. The Italian version of this scale showed a good internal consistency (α = 0.80).
Perceived Self-efficacy in handling Negative Emotions Scale (APEN/A).  This is a self-report scale composed of 8 items measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never/not at all) to 5 (always/very much) and covering the degree of ability in handling negative emotions. The Italian version of this scale showed a good internal consistency (α = 0.82).
Internet addiction test (IAT).  This is a self-report scale composed of 20 items scored on a five-point Likert scale. The instrument assesses the severity of Internet addictive behavior. According to Young,  we first subdivided the Internet users into three sub-groups: Minimal users (from 20 to 39), Moderate users (from 40 to 59) and Excessive users (from 60 to 100). For the purpose of this analysis, due to the low number of subjects belonging to the third group (excessive or pathological users = 0.01%), we summed the individuals of the third sub-group with those of the second one. In this way, we finally obtained two subgroups, which were labeled as "non-problematic users" and "problematic users." The Italian validation  of the IAT showed that the two-factor model, which consists of Factor 1 - Emotional and Cognitive Preoccupation (ECP) with the Internet and Factor 2 - LCI with daily life, performs better than the one-factor model (α = 0.89).
In this study, the analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version (SPSS) 19.0.1 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) for Windows (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA). We applied multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA), Pearson's indices and linear regression analysis.
| Results|| |
A total of 670 college students (males = 164, 24.5%; females = 506, 75.5%) participated in the survey. Subjects were between 18 and 36 years of age (males = 20.93, SD = 2.52; males = 21.43, SD = 2.95; females: Male = 20.76, SD = 2.35). We found no significant differences in age between females and males (t = ns).
According to the cut-off scores for all of the scales used in our research, we found that the majority of males (n = 145) and females (n = 475) were classified as "non-problematic users" with respect to the IAT score: Males and females classified as "problematic users" were n = 13 and n = 16, respectively. Furthermore, females exhibited a "moderate" ASP/A score and a "low" score for the APEN/A. On the contrary, males obtained a "high" ASP/A and a "moderate" APEN/A.
As a first step, MANOVA was applied to explore the variables in relation to gender. [Table 1] shows F statistics and P values of the analysis. More specifically, the results revealed significant differences in the APEN/A score (F(1) =15.62, P = 0.000) and IAT total score (F(1) =15.61, P = 000). Furthermore, a significant difference (F(1) =24.54, P =0.000) emerged between males and females in the first factor of the IAT (ECP).
Considering the small number of participants with problematic use of the Internet in the two groups (males = 13 and females = 16), we decided to explore the APEN/A, ASP/A and ESS scores both in the non-problematic users and in the problematic users of the total sample (n = 613, n = 26, respectively). We conducted MANOVA, using the typology of Internet user (problematic or non-problematic) as the independent variable and the remaining variables as dependent variables. The results showed significant differences between problematic internet users and non-problematic internet users in the ESS scores [Table 2].
|Table 2: F statistics, P values, means and SD of the variables in the total sample (MANOVA)|
Click here to view
Correlations and regressions among variables
We tested significant inter-relations among the variables of interest, as shown in [Table 3]. The results show that ASP/A and APEN/A are strongly and significantly related. A significant and negative relationship also emerged between the IAT total score and APEN/A. Finally, ESS scores were negatively related with the ASP/A and APEN/A and positively with both the total IAT score and the two factors of the IAT (ECP and LCI).
|Table 3: Means, SD and correlation matrix of the variables in the total sample|
Click here to view
Finally, we performed a linear regression analysis to test whether self-efficacy and shame predicted abuse of the Internet. The findings reveal that only shame was a good predictor of the IAT (R Adjusted Square = 0.136, F(1) =100.7, P < 0.001), in particular with respect to its first factor (ECP) (R Adjusted Square = 0.141, F(1) =106.0, P < 0.001).
| Discussion and Conclusion|| |
The present study primarily sought to explore the influence of shame and perceived self-efficacy on the use/abuse of the Internet. As described in the results section, we proceeded with various steps to explore the patterns of the variables of interest in groups differentiated by gender, type of Internet usage (problematic and non-problematic) and in the whole sample.
In general, these first findings suggest a good correlation between ESS and the Problematic Internet Usage, while perceived self-efficacy seems to not be meaningfully related to the use/abuse of the Internet. Pearson's correlation indices, as we expected, showed significant and negative correlations between ESS total score and the two dimensions of perceived self-efficacy (ASP/A and APEN/A total scores). We found also that ESS was significantly and positively related with the IAT total score and its two factors (ECP and LCI), whereas there was no significant correlations between ASP/A, APEN/A and IAT total score [Table 3]. Finally, we applied a linear regression analysis in order to explore the predictive capacity of both self-efficacy and shame on Internet use/abuse. As expected, based on previous findings, a conjoint effect of both self-efficacy and shame on IAT scores was not confirmed. For this reason, we may conclude that the outcomes of this survey partially confirmed our initial hypothesis. In fact, the ESS score alone plays a role in the Internet abuse. More specifically, this study showed that the shame has a negative impact on Internet use and most of its predictive capacity is focused on the first factor (ECP) of the IAT.
One of most significant limitations of this study is the absence of a clinical group of Internet-addicted patients. We maintain that further studies should explore the relationship between self-efficacy, shame and Internet addiction.
| References|| |
|1.||Griffith M. Internet addiction: Does it really exist? In: Gackenbach J, editor. Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. New York: Academic Press; 2007. p. 61-75. |
|2.||Wallace P. The Psychology of the Internet. Cambrigde: Cambrigde University Press; 1999. |
|3.||Shapira NA, Lessig MC, Goldsmith TD, Szabo ST, Lazoritz M, Gold MS, et al. Problematic internet use: Proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depress Anxiety 2003;17:207-16. |
|4.||Chou C, Hsiao MC. Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: The Taiwan college students' case. Comput Educ 2000;35:65-80. |
|5.||Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen CC, Chen SH, Yen CF. Proposed diagnostic criteria of Internet addiction for adolescents. J Nerv Ment Dis 2005;193:728-33. |
|6.||Young K. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998;3:237-44. |
|7.||De Berardis D, D'Albenzio A, Gambi F, Sepede G, Valchera A, Conti CM, et al. Alexithymia and its relationships with dissociative experiences and Internet addiction in a nonclinical sample. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;12:67-9. |
|8.||Tao R, Huang X, Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Li M. Proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Addiction 2010;105:556-64. |
|9.||Xiuqin H, Huimin Z, Mengchen L, Jinan W, Ying Z, Ran T. Mental health, personality, and parental rearing styles of adolescents with Internet addiction disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2010;13:401-6. |
|10.||Craparo G. Internet addiction, dissociation, and alexithymia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2011;30:1051-6. |
|11.||Flores PJ. Addiction as an Attachment Disorder. Northvale, (NJ): Jason Aronson Press; 2004. |
|12.||Ko CH, Yen JY, Liu SC, Huang CF, Yen CF. The associations between aggressive behaviors and internet addiction and online activities in adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2009;44:598-605. |
|13.||Jang KS, Hwang SY, Choi JY. Internet addiction and psychiatric symptoms among Korean adolescents. J Sch Health 2008;78:165-71. |
|14.||Yates TM, Gregor MA, Haviland MG. Child maltreatment, alexithymia, and problematic internet use in young adulthood. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2012;15:219-25. |
|15.||Chen YF, Peng SS. University students' Internet use and its relationships with academic performance, interpersonal relationships, psychosocial adjustment, and self-evaluation. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008;11:467-9. |
|16.||Kuss DJ, van Rooij AJ, Shorter GW, Griffiths MD, van de Mheen D. Internet addiction in adolescents: Prevalence and risk factors. Comput Human Behav 2013;29:1987-96. |
|17.||Wu AM, Cheung VI, Ku L, Hung EP. Psychological risk factors of addiction to social networking sites among Chinese smartphone users. J Behav Addict 2013;2:160-6. |
|18.||Müller KW, Glaesmer H, Brähler E, Wölfling K, Beutel ME. Prevalence of internet addiction in the general population: Results from a German population-based survey. Behav Inf Technol 2013;32. |
|19.||Parks MR, Floyd K. Making friends in cyberspace. J Commun 1996;46:80-97. |
|20.||McKenna KY, Bargh J. Coming out in the age of the internet: Internet demarginalization through virtual group participation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998;75:681-94. |
|21.||Joinson AN. Causes and effects of disinhibition on the internet. In: Gackenbach J, editor. The Psychology of the Internet. New York: Academic Press: 1998. p. 43-60. |
|22.||Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997. |
|23.||Andrews B, Qian M, Valentine JD. Predicting depressive symptoms with a new measure of shame: The Experience of Shame Scale. Br J Clin Psychol 2002;41:29-42. |
|24.||Caprara GV, Gerbino M. La Valutazione dell'Autoefficacia. Trento: Erickson; 2001. |
|25.||Faraci P, Craparo G, Messina R, Severino S. Internet Addiction Test (IAT): Which is the best factorial solution? J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e225. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]