|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 540-546
Intimate partner violence and psychiatric comorbidity in infertile women - A cross-sectional hospital based study
Swapna Bondade1, Rupa S Iyengar2, BK Shivakumar1, KN Karthik1
1 Department of Psychiatry, The Oxford Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Oxford Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
|Date of Web Publication||9-Nov-2018|
Dr. Rupa S Iyengar
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Oxford Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background and Aim: In Asian countries, child bearing is a social obligation. Experience of infertility profoundly affects the personal well-being of women. Women with infertility are at a higher risk of anxiety, depression, and Intimate partner violence (IPV). In this background the present study was carried out to determine IPV and psychiatric comorbidity in women with infertility. Methods: Hundred consecutive women with primary infertility in the age group of 18 years to 45 years were included in the study. Psychiatric diagnosis was made according to DSM-5. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) were used to assess the severity of the anxiety and depressive symptoms. IPV was assessed using WHO violence against women instrument. Results: The mean age of the 100 women was 26.73 ± 4.23 years, duration of marriage was 7.11 ± 4.177 years and duration of infertility treatment in years was 5.56 ± 3.89. The prevalence of IPV among patients was 50% and psychiatric comorbidity was 46%. When we compared the women who experienced IPV and who did not, the prevalence of anxiety disorder and depressive disorder was high among IPV group. Anxiety, depressive scores in HAM A, HAM D were higher in IPV group compared to the other group and was statistically significant. Conclusion: A significant number of women who had infertility reported IPV. This emphasizes the importance of screening for IPV in these women. It is observed that women with IPV had higher psychiatric comorbidity and may require psychotherapeutic intervention.
Keywords: Infertility, intimate partner violence, psychiatric comorbidity
|How to cite this article:|
Bondade S, Iyengar RS, Shivakumar B K, Karthik K N. Intimate partner violence and psychiatric comorbidity in infertile women - A cross-sectional hospital based study. Indian J Psychol Med 2018;40:540-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Bondade S, Iyengar RS, Shivakumar B K, Karthik K N. Intimate partner violence and psychiatric comorbidity in infertile women - A cross-sectional hospital based study. Indian J Psychol Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 May 24];40:540-6. Available from: http://www.ijpm.info/text.asp?2018/40/6/540/245072
| Introduction|| |
“Infertility is the inability of a sexually active, non-contracepting couple to achieve pregnancy in one year.” The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 60 to 80 million couples worldwide suffer from infertility. Infertility has dissimilar prevalence across regions of the world and is estimated to affect 8 to 12% of couples worldwide, and in India, the prevalence of primary infertility is 3.9–16.8%.,, Intimate partner violence (IPV) is defined by WHO as physical violence, sexual violence, stalking, and psychological aggression (including coercive acts) by an intimate partner.
Having children is a social responsibility for a family. Inability to fulfil this responsibility adversely affects the social life, emotional status, marital relations, future plans, self-esteem, and body image of the couple., Couples live in fear and anxiety about infertility as well as the infertility diagnosis, treatment process, and treatment outcome. Each individual blames himself/herself and reflects his/her anger toward the other. This situation may cause conflict between the spouses, decrease in self-esteem, decrease infrequency of sexual intercourse, and the development of feelings of inadequacy. As a result, the bonds of marriage are put under psychological pressure: therefore, infertility can be a reason for marital incompatibility and also divorce. The factors that ruin marital harmony and satisfaction also cause domestic violence and are reported to increase the possibility of women being subjected to domestic violence more than twofold. Stress, anxiety, and depression scores among infertile couples are higher than in fertile population, and females are more psychologically affected than males.,
In a male-dominated society, it is usual to believe that women are the cause of infertility, and subsequently, they have to go through emotional crisis and the domestic violence. Factors such as educational level, employment status, autonomy, status in the society also determine the risk for violence in infertile women. There are many studies done in the Middle East Asia n countries and western countries regarding IPV in infertile women, and there is a paucity of literature in Indian population. In this background, the present study was carried out to determine the prevalence of IPV and psychiatric comorbidity in infertile women.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study, conducted in The Oxford Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Bangalore in the year 2016 for a duration of three months. According to WHO, the prevalence of primary infertility in India is 3.9–16.8%. We took 7% prevalence. Using the sample size calculation formula:
Where Z1-α/22=1.962, P = Expected portion in the population based on a previous study (7%), d = Absolute error of precision (5%), a sample size of 100 was obtained. Consecutive hundred patients who attended the infertility clinic of the department of OBG in the age group of 18 to 45 years were included. Those patients who were diagnosed to be having primary infertility according to WHO definition were included. According to WHO, “When a woman is unable to ever bear a child, either due to the inability to become pregnant or the inability to carry a pregnancy to a live birth she would be classified as having primary infertility”. Written informed consent was taken from all cases and were interviewed in a separate room. Participants were assured of confidentiality terms regarding their personal information. Participation in the study was voluntary, and the spouses of infertile women were not present at the time of interviews. They were administered a semi-structured proforma to collect socio-demographic details of the patient and their spouses.
IPV was assessed by WHO violence against women instrument. The questionnaire was self-administered for the cases who were literate, and for those who were illiterate, the questions were translated and read in the local language. The same researcher and the same wordings were used while asking the questions to all illiterate participants.
Psychiatric diagnosis was made according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 criteria (DSM-5), anxiety was assessed using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and depression was assessed using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Collection of socio-demographic details and diagnosis of infertility were done by a Gynecologist; interviewing the patient for IPV, making the psychiatric diagnosis according to DSM-5, and application of HAM-A and HAM-D were done by a Psychiatrist. The women with IPV and cases having psychiatric comorbidity were given the option of psychiatric help. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the institute.
The WHO violence against women instrument
This was developed for use in the WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women. In this study, questions 703-706 from section 7 of the WHO study questionnaire were used. These questions on partner violence explore aspects of controlling behaviors, emotional abuse, physical violence, and sexual violence (703-706). For the ease of communication, in this study, controlling behaviors and emotional abuse were clubbed as psychological violence, and physical and sexual violence were clubbed together.
The data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows version 16.0 software (SPSS.INC Chicago, IL, USA). Data were tested for normal distribution using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Chi-square test and Fisher exact P test were used for categorical data, and the Student t test was used for continuous data. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between IPV (dependent variable) and duration of marriage, duration of infertility treatment, husband's age, and husband's alcohol use (independent variables).
| Results|| |
The mean age of the patients visiting the infertility clinic was 26.73 ± 4.23 years. Most of the patients were literate and 20% had no education. Most of them were homemakers and belonged to a joint family. The mean duration of marriage was 7.11 ± 4.17 years, and duration of infertility treatment was 5.56 ± 3.89 years. The average age of the husband was 33.2 ± 5.65 years. Approximately, 46% of the patients had psychiatric comorbidities: 25% had a depressive disorder and 21% had an anxiety disorder. Approximately, 50% of the patients had a history of IPV: 34% had psychological violence and 16% had physical and sexual violence [Table 1].
|Table 1: Demographic details and clinical variables of females attending infertility clinic|
Click here to view
When we compared the females who did not have IPV and those who had IPV, it was observed that duration of the marriage, duration of infertility treatment, HAM-D and HAM-A scores, the age of the husband, suicidal ideas, and alcohol abuse in the spouse were more in IPV group than in the non-IPV group. Depressive and anxiety disorders were more in the IPV group than in non-IPV, and this difference was statistically significant [Table 2]. The odds of IPV were more with increase in age (OR = 1.645, P < 0.05), duration of marriage (OR = 1.096, P < 0.05), duration of infertility (OR = 1.197, P < 0.05), and husband's age (OR = 0.633, P < 0.05) and the presence alcohol abuse in husband (OR = 1.246, P < 0.05) [Table 3].
|Table 3: Logistic regression and predictors of intimate partner violence variable|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In total, 50% of the infertile patients had suffered IPV: 34% had psychological violence, 11% had physical violence, and 5% had sexual violence. Different studies have reported 33.6–77.8% of infertile women to experience marital violence.,,,,, Psychological violence reported in our study is 34%, whereas in other studies it was observed to be 33.8–74.3%.,,, Physical violence in our study was 11%, whereas in the studies by Farzadi et al. and Ardabily et al. it was 45% and 14%, respectively. The 2005 WHO report had stated a worldwide rate of physical violence as high as 13–61% for women. Sexual violence in our study was 5%, it was observed to be 8% by Ardabily et al. and 7.3% by Yildizhan et al. There is a huge variation in the prevalence of IPV and different types of violence as these studies are done in different societies and countries and in countries with different socio-economic status, and also owing to usage of different data collecting tools.
In our study, it was observed that there was an association of IPV with an increase in duration of marriage and an increase in duration of infertility, similar to Ozgoli et al. and Alazmy et al. As the duration of marriage increases, the duration of infertility increases and so do familial expectations/pressures and responsibilities, visit to physician, and investigations and waiting for the report, which may impair the quality of marital relationship and can lead to violence.
In our study, there was an association of IPV and alcohol use by spouse similar to the findings of Ozgoli et al. and Aklimunnessa et al. Use of substance is a behavioral risk factor, and under the influence of alcohol, the inhibitions are lost, and this can lead to aggressive behavior in the men.
In our study, psychiatric comorbidity was present in 46% of infertile women, out of which 25% had depression and 21% had an anxiety disorder. This finding was concordant with the findings of Chen et al. who reported that 40.2% of women had a psychiatric illness. They found anxiety disorder in 23.2% and depression in 26.8%. A study done in Saudi Arabia also mentioned that depression (26.2%) was more prevalent than the anxiety disorder (22%) in infertile female subjects, and the rates are similar to those of our study. Suicidal ideas were present in 16% in our study, which was similar to the study finding of Alosaimi et al. who reported around 17%.
Although the prevalence of clinically relevant mood disorders in infertile women before infertility treatment remains debatable, the diagnosis of infertility undoubtedly poses considerable stress. Psychosocial factors associated with infertility can play a significant role in the development of mood symptoms following such a diagnosis. However, the likelihood of infertility causing clinically significant depressive symptoms is less clear and is confounded by numerous variables. Some of these variables include, but are not limited to, a history of pre-existing mood disorder, the stage of treatment, and the coping skills and attitudes of the individual. Most research to this point has yielded equivocal results on whether there is a generalized increased rate of new-onset depression in women diagnosed with infertility.
In the present study, psychiatric comorbidity was observed to be more in cases having IPV than the non-IPV group, and this difference was statistically significant. Depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and suicidal ideas were more in the IPV group than the non-IPV group, and this difference was statically significant.
IPV experience is strongly and consistently associated with depression, including depressive symptoms and depressive disorders, and suicide in cross-sectional studies of women in both high- and lower-income settings., Although it is easy to assume that IPV is causally related to subsequent depression and suicidal behavior, evidence suggests a more complex relationship. There are three modes of association, which are possible in any combination: (1) IPV exposure causes subsequent depression and suicide attempts, (2) depression and/or suicide attempts cause subsequent IPV, and (3) there are common risk factors for both IPV and depression and suicide attempts that explain the association between them.
Traumatic stress is the main mechanism by which IPV might cause subsequent depression and suicide attempts. Traumatic events can lead to stress, fear, and isolation, which in turn may lead to depression and suicidal behavior.
Conversely, other studies suggest that women with severe mental health difficulties are more likely to experience violent victimization., It is plausible that depressive symptoms may influence partner selection, such that young men and women are more accepting of partners with poor impulse control, conduct disorders, or other factors that predispose partners to use violence. Developmental and early life exposures to violence and other traumas may also play a role in predicting both violence and depression, for example, by contributing to the formation of insecure or disorganized attachment styles, which are associated with both increased IPV and depression risk. In summary, it seems that the relationship between IPV and depression is bidirectional, with women who are exposed to IPV being at increased risk of depression symptoms, and women who report depressive symptoms being more likely to subsequently experience IPV.
Although a single causal link between depression, anxiety, infertility, and IPV is yet to be identified, there are several studies that correlate depression, anxiety, and IPV; and infertility and IPV, but there is a paucity of literature on how these factors influence each other. Arcuri et al. stated that stress hormones and their effect on sex hormones and ultimately fertility. They identified an association between the activity of 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, the ovarian enzyme that catalyzes cortisol, and fertility. Schenker et al. proposed that stress hormones interfere with gamete transport through the Fallopian tube More Detailss by interacting directly with receptors in the fallopian tubes, diminishing blood flow to these structures.
Although the nature of the relationship between depression and infertility is yet to be elucidated, few would argue that they affect each other. A causal link between infertility and clinically significant depression and IPV is likely to have direct and indirect aspects. Additional research in this area is indicated to further clarify this multifaceted relationship.
There are certain limitations in this study. Study was conducted in the infertility clinic in the general hospital set up, so the findings cannot be generalized to the community. The type of treatment for infertility and the number of cycles of treatment in the individual were not discussed, and these can influence the psychological state of the women. Except for alcohol use, other psychological conditions in the husband were not evaluated.
To conclude, the study shows that significant number of infertile women have IPV and psychiatric comorbidity. Therefore, identification and prevention of this IPV are important. Several factors influence IPV that in turn adversely influence the mental health of infertile women. The relationship between infertility and IPV should be investigated in different cultural contexts. IPV is a major risk factor to the mental health of an individual, and these individuals require special attention to overcome possible mental disorders. Mental health is inherent to the well-being of the members of a community. Therefore, effectual psychological interventions should be integrated for the treatment of infertility. In this regard, use of complementary approaches such as relaxation techniques, stress management, coping skill training, and group support; medical therapy for emotional disorders; and psychiatric consultation could alleviate the adverse consequences of violence and improve the quality of life of the victims.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Vanderpoel S. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world health organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1520-4.
World Health Organization. Infecundity, infertility, and childlessness in developing countries. DHS Comparative Reports No 9. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ORC Macro and the World Health Organization; 2004.
Sciarra J. Infertility: An international health problem. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994;46:155-63.
Population Council. Infertility. Looking back, looking forward: A profile of sexual and reproductive health in India. New Delhi: Population Council; 2004. p. 67-72.
Drosdzol A, Skrzypulec V, Quality of life and sexual functioning of Polish infertile couples. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008;13:271-81.
Taşçı E, Bolsoy N, Kavlak O, Yücesoy F. Marital adjustment in infertile women. J Turk SocObstetGynecol 2008;5:105-10.
Özçelik B, Karamustafalıoğlu O, Özçelik A. The psychological and psychiatric aspects of infertility. Anadolu Psikiyatr 2007;8:140-8.
Moghadam ZB, Salsali M, Erdabili HE, Ramezanzadeh F, Veismoradi M. The impact of infertility on pschological and social status of women in Iran: Acontent analysis study. Int J Fertil Steril 2011;5(Suppl 1):Pnm-6.
Yildizhan R, Adali E, Kolusari A, Kurdoglu M, Yildizhan B, Sahin G. Domestic violence against infertile women in a Turkish setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;104:110-2.
Pasch LA, Dunkel-Schetter C, Christensen A. Differences between husbands' and wives' approach to infertility affect marital communication and adjustment. Fertil Steril 2006;77:1241-47.
Benyamini Y, Gozlan M, Kokia E. Variability in the diffuculties experienced by women undergoing infertility treatments. Fertil Steril 2006;83:275-83.
Akyüz A, Şahiner G, Bakir B. Marital violence: Is it a factor affecting the reproductive health status of women? J Fam Viol 2008;23:437-45.
Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001356.doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed. 1001356.
Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C. WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women. Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes, and women's responses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
Pasi AL, Hanchate MS, Pasha MA. Infertility and domestic violence: Cause, consequence and management in Indian scenario. Biomed Res 2011;22:255-8.
Ardabily HE, Moghadam ZB, Salsali M, Ramezanzadeh F, Nedjat S. Prevalence and risk factors for domestic violence against infertile women in an Iranian setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;112:15-7.
Leung TW, Ng EHY, Leung WC, Ho PC. Intimate partner violence among infertile women. Int J GynaecolObstet 2003;83:323-4.
Ameh N, Kene TS, Onuh SO, Okohue JE, Umeora DU, Anozie OB. Burden of domestic violence amongst infertile women attending infertility clinics in Nigeria. Niger J Med 2007;16:375-7.
SheikhanK, Ozgoli G, Azar M, Alavimajd H. Domestic violence in Iranian infertile women. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2014;28:152.
Akyuza A, Seven M, Şahiner G, Bakır B. Studying the effect of infertility on marital violence in turkish women. Int J Fertil Steril 2013;6:286-93.
Farzadia L, Ghasemzadeha A, Asla ZB, Mahinib M, Shirdelc H. Intimate partner violence against infertile women. J Clin Res Governance 2014;3:1-6.
Ozgoli G, Sheikhan Z, Zahiroddin A, Nasiri M, Amiri S, KholosiBadr F. Evaluation of the prevalence and contributing factors of psychological intimate partner violence in infertile women. J Midwifery Reprod Health 2016;4:571-81.
Alazmy SF, Alotaibi DM, Atwan AA, Kamel MI, El-Shazly MK. Gender differenceof knowledge and attitude of primary health care staff towards domestic violence. Alex J Med 2011;47:337-41.
Aklimunnessa K, Khan MM, Kabir M, Mori M. Prevalence and correlates of domestic violence by husbands against wives in Bangladesh: Evidence from a national survey. J Men's Health Gender 2007;4:52-63.
Chen TH, Chang SP, Tsai CF, JuangKD. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disordersin an assisted reproductive technique clinic. HumReprod 2004;19:2313-8.
Alosaimi FD, Altuwirqi MH, Bukhari M, Abotalib Z, BinSalehc S. Psychiatric disorders among infertile men and women attending three infertility clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2015;35:359-67.
Wilkins MK, Warnock JK, Serrano E. Depressive symptoms related to infertility and infertility treatments. Psychiatr Clin N
Devries KM, Kiss L, Watts C, Yoshihama M, Deyessa N. Violence against women is strongly associated with suicide attempts: Evidence from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women. Soc Sci Med 2011;73:79-86.
Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: An observational study. Lancet 2008;371:1165-72.
Devries KM, Mak J, Bacchus LJ, Child JC, Falder G, Petzold M, et al
. Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Med 10:e1001439.doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed. 1001439.
Hyde JS, Mezulis AH, Abramson LY. The ABCs of depression: Integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychol Rev 2008;115:291-13.
Khalifeh H, Dean K. Gender and violence against people with severe mental illness. Int Rev Psychiatry 2010;22:535-46.
McPherson M, Delva J, Cranford JA. A longitudinal investigation of intimate partner violence among mothers with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:675-80.
Doumas DM, Pearson CL, Elgin JE, McKinley LL. Adult attachment as a risk factor for intimate partner violence: The ''mispairing'' of partners' attachment styles. J Interpers Violence 2008;23:616-34.
Arcuri F, Moner C, Lockwood CJ. Expression of 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase during decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells. Endocrinology 1996;137:595-600.
Schenker JG, Meirow D, Schenker E. Stress and human reproduction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992;45:1-8.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]