Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
  Home | About Us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Contact | Advertise | Submission | Login 
Users Online: 446 
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layoutHome Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
 Table of Contents    
LEARNING CURVE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 41  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 201-202  

Describing research design


Department of Psychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication4-Mar-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Chittaranjan Andrade
Department of Psychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru - 560 029, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_66_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


This article explains how the research design of a study can simultaneously be described in many different ways as nonempirical or empirical, case-based or sample-based, observational or interventional, retrospective or prospective, cross-sectional or longitudinal, uncontrolled or controlled, single arm or multiple arm, nonrandomized or randomized, crossover or parallel group, nonblind, single-blind, or double-blind, superiority or noninferiority, exploratory (hypothesis generating) or confirmatory (hypothesis driven), and many others. Some of these categories can be associated with special types of research design as well, such as cohort studies, case-control studies, nested case-control studies, wedge design studies, and so on. Readers should understand which descriptors are mutually exclusive and which are not.

Keywords: Case-control study, cross-sectional study, prospective study, randomized controlled trial, research design


How to cite this article:
Andrade C. Describing research design. Indian J Psychol Med 2019;41:201-2

How to cite this URL:
Andrade C. Describing research design. Indian J Psychol Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 14];41:201-2. Available from: http://www.ijpm.info/text.asp?2019/41/2/201/253381




   Describing Research Design Top


Singh et al.[1] made a curious observation in an earlier issue of this journal; the gist was that because their study[2] was cross-sectional in design, it could not be considered prospective. Their observation prompted a discussion in eJCIndia,[3] during the course of which it became apparent that there are widespread misunderstandings about how research design is described. This article will not explain research design; rather, it will explain how the same study can be simultaneously described under different heads of research design, and which descriptors are mutually exclusive and which are not.

The box presents ways in which the research design of a study may be described. The list is not exhaustive. Examples of descriptors that are not included are quasi-experimental studies, which are a special type of controlled study; wedge design studies, which are a special type of crossover trial; cohort studies, which are a special type of group studies; nested case-control studies in which cases and controls are identified from within a cohort; and others.



The reader will now immediately see that a study can be classified in many different ways at the same time, as in randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, parallel arm superiority trials that are additionally, and almost by definition, empirical, sample-based, prospective, longitudinal, interventional, and hypothesis-driven in nature. The reader will now also understand why the study of Singh et al.[2] was both prospective and cross-sectional. It was prospective because they recruited subjects and collected new data, as different from extracting data that already existed in paper or electronic records (which would have made it a retrospective study). It was cross-sectional because the subjects were assessed at a single point in time as different from being assessed at repeated time points during follow-up (which would have made it a longitudinal study). Note that cross-sectional and longitudinal studies can each be either retrospective or prospective.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Singh M, Sharma P, Raj D, Sharma S, Kaushal A, Raina SK. Authors' responses to the comments on “leisure time physical activity and risk of developing depression among the youth of Kangra District, Himachal Pradesh, India”. Indian J Psychol Med 2019;41:94-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  
2.
Singh M, Sharma P, Raj D, Sharma S, Kaushal A, Raina SK. Leisure time physical activity and risk of developing depression among the youth of Kangra district, Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian J Psychol Med 2018;40:426-32.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
Thakurdesai A, Ghosh A, Menon V, Sahoo S, Tripathi A, Harshe D, et al. Electronic journal clubs for capacity building: A case study in psychiatry as a model for medical disciplines in developing countries. Asian J Psychiatr 2018;34:93-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Describing Resea...
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed353    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded66    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal