Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
  Home | About Us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Contact | Advertise | Submission | Login 
Users Online: 713 
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layoutHome Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 42  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 155-161  

Neurocognitive profile in Indian individuals genetically at risk of schizophrenia


1 Department of Psychiatry, NRSMC, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Psychiatry, JNMC, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Health and FW, Govt of W.B, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Submission31-May-2019
Date of Decision16-Jul-2019
Date of Acceptance11-Nov-2019
Date of Web Publication9-Mar-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sunny Chattopadhyay
K-19, Kestopur Road, Block-2, Teachers' Housing Society, Burdwan 713 104, Bardhaman, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_243_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Cognitive deficits have been noted in patients of schizophrenia in remission, as well as in first-degree relatives. This study aims to evaluate the neurocognitive performance in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients of schizophrenia in comparison with healthy controls, as well as patients of schizophrenia in remission. Methods: It was a 1-year case-control study by purposive sampling. Patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, first-degree relatives of patients of schizophrenia, and controls from nongenetic relatives of patients were recruited as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. Samples were matched for age and educational status. The General Health Questionnaire 28 (GHQ-28) screened them and they were checked for remission by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and then subjected to various instruments for assessment of neurocognition, standardized for the Indian population. To remove the effect of symptoms as confounding factors, PANSS score of <3 for each individual item was set as the criterion for remission. Intelligence quotient (IQ) was screened in all participants to exclude mental retardation. Statistical analysis used was the analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Fisher's least significant difference (LSD). Results: Significant neurocognitive impairments were detected in the patients and first-degree relatives when compared with the control subjects. The most common impairment in the patient group was in speed of processing, and among unaffected first-degree relatives, it was in the working memory. Conclusion: Indian individuals genetically at risk of schizophrenia showed significant neurocognitive impairments in all domains compared with controls.

Keywords: Cognitive impairment, executive function, first.degree relative, verbal memory, working memory
Key messages: Neurocognitive deficits occur in stable patients of schizophrenia. On assessment by instruments standardized for the Indian population, deficits were evident in all domains for individuals, asymptomatic but genetically susceptible. Hence, asymptomatic siblings of patients of schizophrenia may require screening.


How to cite this article:
Chattopadhyay S, Patil NM, Nayak RB, Chate SS, Singh OP. Neurocognitive profile in Indian individuals genetically at risk of schizophrenia. Indian J Psychol Med 2020;42:155-61

How to cite this URL:
Chattopadhyay S, Patil NM, Nayak RB, Chate SS, Singh OP. Neurocognitive profile in Indian individuals genetically at risk of schizophrenia. Indian J Psychol Med [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 2];42:155-61. Available from: http://www.ijpm.info/text.asp?2020/42/2/155/278243



Emil Kraepelin described dementia praecox or a group of schizophrenias as a disease with an early onset, a deteriorating course with hallucinations and delusions, and cognitive changes.[1] Bleuler further explained that delusions and hallucinations were secondary to cognitive changes.[2] Cognition is the sum total of mental processes that enable us to acquire knowledge and keep us aware of our surroundings, thereby enabling us to make appropriate judgments.[3] The Division of Mental Disorders of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), USA initiated and funded workshops known as the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS).[4] The different domains of cognition impaired in schizophrenia, according to the NIMH-MATRICS are the speed of processing, attention or vigilance, working memory, verbal memory, visual memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and social cognition. Studies on cognition show that patients with schizophrenia perform at least one standard deviation (SD) below the normal population in global intellectual abilities, which places them in the lower 15 percentile of global intellectual ability.[5] The importance of cognition extends beyond mental processes. Recently, it was noted that weight gain induced by antipsychotic therapy was affected not only by the body mass index (BMI) but also by cognitive performance.[6],[7]

Cognitive deficits in relatives of patients of schizophrenia

Genetic factors are a determinant in the etiology of schizophrenia.[8] Schizophrenia heavily affects certain families. This tendency of genetic loading indicates a need to study relatives to better understand the genetic underpinning. Cognitive assessments performed as a part of routine assessment of asymptomatic people had shown deficits in people who developed schizophrenia years later.[9] Relatives of patients with schizophrenia have been shown to have an increased reaction time, indicating a decreased speed of processing.[10] In a recent ongoing study, known as the Pittsburgh Risk Evaluation Program (PREP), first- and second-degree relatives were shown to have neurocognitive impairments.[11]

Although not diagnostic of a disease but certain symptoms are frequently found with the disease. They exhibit close inheritance with the candidate gene or the gene region.[12] The study of these symptoms is an alternative experimental strategy and can increase our etiological understanding of the disorder. Evidence supports the fact that the same gene may be responsible for cognitive impairment as well as schizophrenia, while other genes may also affect cognition.[13]

Research question

Most of the current literature focuses on the Caucasian race, with the Asian population being severely under-represented despite accounting for two-thirds of the world population. Substantial research since the beginning of this century has suggested genetic variation as the basis for differences in the phenotype and disease susceptibility across groups.[14] A literature search for Indian studies on neurocognitive deficits of schizophrenic probands revealed only a few studies with highly inconsistent results [Table 1]. Domains of cognitive deficits, as prescribed by MATRICES, have rarely been examined. As mentioned by Solanki et al., the tests used in these studies were not standardized for the Indian population. Moreover, we could not obtain any findings on visual learning and visual memory. The domain of speed of processing also remains unexplored. Although executive function has been explored, the ability to innovate spontaneously has not. A test of design fluency, which has a distinct advantage in estimating executive function, might serve this purpose.[15] The effect of intelligence quotient (IQ) as a confounding factor has also not been investigated.

We, therefore, decided to screen IQ before the cognitive assessment and exclude subjects with subnormal intelligence. Remission was ascertained for the participating patients. The tests used were standardized for the Indian population, and all domains of neurocognition, as mentioned by NIMH- MATRICES, were assessed using tests different from those already used, thus, enhancing reliability.
Table 1: Indian studies on neurocognition in schizophrenia

Click here to view



   Subjects and methods Top


The study was conducted at a tertiary care center in India for a period of 1 year from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011. The institutional ethical committee provided ethical clearance. All patients of schizophrenia in remission (stable) attending the psychiatry outpatient department (OPD) and patients admitted in the psychiatry ward of the hospital were included in the study (Group 1). Eligible first-degree relatives of patients of schizophrenia attending the psychiatry OPD and patients admitted in the psychiatry ward of the hospital were identified (Group 2). The controls were nongenetic relatives of patients, who were neither suffering from a mental illness, attending psychiatry OPD nor admitted in the psychiatry ward of the hospital (Group 3). A cross-sectional analysis was carried out in this case-control study by purposive sampling.

The inclusion criteria were an age between 18 and 50 years, an English education up to at least the tenth grade, and consent to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria were having co-morbid conditions, such as drug abuse (except nicotine dependence); affective disorders; dementia; mental retardation; a history of head injury; or a seizure within 1 year. Subjects showing extrapyramidal symptoms were excluded. Mood symptoms were assessed and their presence was a criterion for exclusion.

A specially prepared pro forma was used to collect the patients' sociodemographic data, history, and examination findings. The International Classification of Diseases 10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research (ICD-10 DCR) for Psychiatric Illnesses by the World Health Organization (WHO) were used to diagnose each patient.[16] Mental retardation was ruled out by screening all subjects using Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM), minimizing the effect of IQ as a confounding factor. All subjects were checked for remission using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The accepted reported criterion for remissions was a PANSS score of <3 for each item in the last 6 months.[24] The General Health Questionnaire 28 (GHQ-28) was used to check the presence of any psychiatric comorbidity. Subsequently, cognitive assessment tests were performed to estimate the extent and nature of cognitive dysfunctions. All these tests have been standardized and validated for the Indian population [Table 2].[21] The speed of processing was tested by the Digit symbol substitution test (DSST), where the time taken to perform the task was the score. Verbal working memory was tested by the N-Back test, while Visual N-Back tested visual working memory. Correct identification was scored as a hit, while not identifying and misidentifying were scored as an error. The Verbal Paired Associates Test tested verbal learning, where the number of pairs correctly reproduced forms the score. Visual learning was tested by the PGI-visual recognition test, where a correct identification and naming of the object is given one mark, while a correct identification but wrong naming fetches ½ mark. Attention and concentration were tested by digit forward, digit backward, and serial subtraction test. Animal name and design fluency (DF) tests were used for assessment of executive function, where the number of items generated is the score.
Table 2: Tests used in the assessment of each domain of cognition and description

Click here to view


Data

Data obtained were tabulated and the means, SDs, and percentages were calculated. Chi-square was used for testing the association (comparing the proportions) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparison of means. Post hoc Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) was used to compare the significance of the group differences. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference between the groups. As multiple tests were applied to the same population, Bonferroni's correction was applied. To keep familywise error rates to a minimum, the critical P value derived was 0.003. Microsoft Excel and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 16, were used for analysis.


   Results Top


Sociodemographic details

The three groups—patients (Group 1, n = 34); unaffected first-degree relatives (Group 2, n = 37); and controls (Group 3, n = 47)—were matched in age (P = 0.5) and educational status (P = 0.76) but not on sex distribution (P = 0.01) [Table 3]. The mean (± SD) duration of disease was 3.7 years among patients.
Table 3: Demographic Variables

Click here to view


Clinical details

Among the patients, most were patients of residual schizophrenia (n = 27). Six patients had undifferentiated schizophrenia and one had paranoid schizophrenia.

Cognitive assessment

Unaffected first-degree relatives showed significant impairments compared with controls in all domains except learning [Table 4]. Based on the norms for the Indian population, the most common impairment in the patients was in the speed of processing, while the most common impairment in the unaffected first-degree relatives was in working memory [Table 5].
Table 4: Performance of the groups in various cognitive assessment tests with post hoc assessment of test of significance of difference among the groups

Click here to view
Table 5: The prevalence of neurocognitive deficits in patients of schizophrenia, first-degree relatives of patients of schizophrenia, and controls

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


We found neurocognitive impairments in unaffected first-degree relatives similar to those in patients of schizophrenia. Patients and first-degree relatives performed significantly worse than the controls in testing for speed of processing, which could be responsible for the slowness in performing various activities exhibited by the patients of schizophrenia.[25] Garg from India reported similar findings.[17] The bilateral parietal and temporal lobes and left middle frontal gyrus are involved in information processing and, probably, are the affected areas.[26]

Working memory includes verbal and visual memory. The patients and first-degree relatives performed significantly worse than the controls in this domain. From India, Harave and Solanki also reported similar findings. Patients also exhibit reduced blood flow in the inferior frontal gyrus, suggesting it as the area affected in working memory disturbance.[27]

Unlike other domains, unaffected first-degree relatives did not show significant impairments in verbal or visual learning.

Executive function deficits are known to be an integral part of schizophrenia. We found significantly higher executive function impairment even in unaffected first-degree relatives, compared with the controls. We used the animal name test and DF test for executive function assessment. The animal name test results showed that the control subjects performed better than patients of stable schizophrenia and unaffected first-degree relatives did. This set of tests assesses the ability to innovate and generate spontaneously, unlike the Trail-making Test (TMT), where the norm is to perform as instructed. In a recent study on the Indian population by Bhatia et al., the findings indicated significant impairments in first-degree relatives. Frontostriatal abnormalities are thought to explain these deficits.[12] In the assessment of attention and vigilance, the patients and first-degree relatives had performed significantly worse than the controls.[28]

A recent longitudinal cohort of more than 1,000 patients reported that patients had intellectual deterioration and poor academic performances much prior to the onset of the illness.[27] In a cross-sectional study, cognitive deficits in first-episode psychosis were similar to those in patients of chronic, long-standing illness.[28],[29] Cognitive impairments in schizophrenia are stable and persistent, unlike the progressive deficits of dementia. On the other hand, they are not evident at birth as in patients of intellectual disabilities. We showed that there is a statistically significant difference from controls in the domains of neurocognition in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients of schizophrenia. Thus, cognitive deficits are certain inherited vulnerabilities that are present in genetically susceptible individuals.


   Conclusion Top


To conclude, our findings suggest that neurocognitive impairments are present not only in patients of stable schizophrenia but also in the unaffected first-degree relatives of patients of schizophrenia. Neurocognitive impairments could also be screening criteria for those at risk. Our findings are in concurrence with studies from the West and suggest that Indian patients of stable schizophrenia and unaffected first-degree relatives of patients of schizophrenia show similar neurocognitive deficits.

Strengths

  1. Tests standardized for the Indian population were applied[20]
  2. We screened out the confounding effect of IQ
  3. Groups were matched with respect to education and age, which affect cognition
  4. Noncomputerized tests were used as many are not well versed in computers
  5. Only patients in remission were assessed
  6. Conservative correction applied as multiple hypothesis testing was done.


Limitations

Our sample size was constrained as we used patients who visited a general hospital during a period of only 1 year. Nicotine dependence was significantly higher in patients, similar to other Indian community studies.[30]

Acknowledgements

We thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Kraepelin E, Barclay RM, Robertson GM. Dementia Praecox and Paraphrenia. Edinburgh: Chicago Medical Book Co; 1919.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Bleuler E. Dementia Praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenien. Giessen: Psychosozial Verlag; 1911.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan & Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry. 10th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Buchanan RW, Davis M, Goff D, Green MF, Keefe RS, Leon AC, et al. A summary of the FDA-NIMH-MATRICS workshop on clinical trial design for neurocognitive drugs for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2005;31:5-19.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Harvey PD, Keefe RS. Studies of cognitive change in patients with schizophrenia following novel antipsychotic treatment. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158;176-84.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Abdul Rashid NA, Lim J, Lam M, Chong SA, Keefe RS, Lee J. Unraveling the relationship between obesity, schizophrenia and cognition. Schizophr Res 2013;151:107-12.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Saddichha S, Ameen S, Akhtar S. Predictors of antipsychotic-induced weight gain in first-episode psychosis: Conclusions from a randomized, double-blind, controlled prospective study of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008;28:27-31.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Cannon TD, Kaprio J, Lonnqvist J, Huttunen M, Koskenvuo M. The genetic epidemiology of schizophrenia in a Finnish twin cohort. A population-based modeling study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:67-74.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Weiser M, Kanyas K, Malaspina D, Harvey PD, Glick I, Goetz D, et al. Sensitivity of ICD-10 diagnosis of psychotic disorders in the Israeli National Hospitalization Registry compared with RDC diagnoses based on SADS-L. Compr Psychiatry 2005;46:38-42.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Birkett P, Sigmundsson T, Sharma T, Toulopoulou T, Griffiths T, Reveley A, et al. Reaction time and sustained attention in schizophrenia and its genetic predisposition. Schizophr Res 2007;95:76-85.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Yung AR, McGorry PD. The prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: Past and current conceptualizations. Schizophr Bull 1996;22:353-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Snitz BE, Macdonald AW, Carter CS. Cognitive deficits in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients: A meta-analytic review of putative endophenotypes. Schizophr Bull 2006;32:179-94.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Keshavan MS, Diwadkar VA, Montrose DM, Stanley JA, Pettegrew JW. Premorbid characterization in schizophrenia: The Pittsburgh high risk study. World Psychiatry 2004;3:163-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mountain JL, Risch N. Assessing genetic contributions to phenotypic differences among 'racial' and 'ethnic' groups. Nat Genet 2004;36:S48-53.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ruff RM, Light RH, Evans RW. The ruff figural fluency test: A normative study with adults. Dev Neuropsychol 1987;3:37-51.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: WHO; 1993.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Garg R, Trivedi JK, Dalal PK, Nischal A, Sinha PK, Varma S. Assessment of cognition in non-affected full biological siblings of patients with schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry 2013;55:331-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
18.
Nehra R, Grover S, Sharma S, Sharma A, Kate N. Neurocognitive Functioning in schizophrenia, their unaffected siblings and healthy controls: A comparison. Indian J Psychol Med 2016;38:50-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
19.
Bhatia T, Garg K, Pogue-Geile M, Nimgaonkar VL, Deshpande SN. Executive functions and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: Comparisons between probands, parents and controls in India. J Postgrad Med 2009;55:3-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
20.
Solanki RK, Kumar A, Satija Y, Gupta S, Singh P. An Indian experience of neurocognitive endophenotypic markers in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients. Indian J Psychiatry 2016;58:20-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
21.
HaraveVS, Shivakumar V, Kalmady SV, Narayanaswamy JC, Varambally S, Venkatasubramanian G. Neurocognitive impairments in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia. Indian J Psychol Med 2017;39:250-3.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Rao SL, Subbakrishna DK, Gopukumar K. NIMHANS Neuropsychology Battery-2004 Manual. Bangalore: National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (Deemed University); 2004.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Pogue-Geile MF, Harrow M. Negative and positive symptoms in schizophrenia and depression: A follow up. Schizophr Bull 1984;10:371-87.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Pershad D, Verma SK. Handbook of PGI Battery of Brain Dysfunction (PGI-BBD). Agra: National Psychological Corporation; 1990.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Keshavan MS. Cognitive impairment, especially executive dysfunction and memory loss, is a key diagnostic component of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2009;70(Suppl 1):13-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Knowles EE, David AS, Reichenberg A. Processing speed deficits in schizophrenia: Reexamining the evidence. Am J Psychiatry 2010;167:828-35.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Sharma T, Antonova L. Cognitive function in schizophrenia. Deficits, functional consequences, and future treatment. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2003;26:25-40.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Meier MH, Caspi A, Reichenberg A, Keefe RS, Fisher HL, Harrington H, et al. Neuropsychological decline in schizophrenia from the premorbid to the postonset period: Evidence from a population-representative longitudinal study. Am J Psychiatry 2014;171:91-101.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Heaton RK, Gladsjo JA, Palmer BW, Kuck J, Marcotte TD, Jeste DV. Stability and course of neuropsychological deficits in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:24-32.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Rani M, Bonu S, Jha P, Nguyen SN, Jamjoum L. Tobacco use in India: Prevalence and predictors of smoking and chewing in a national cross sectional household survey. Tob Control 2003.  Back to cited text no. 30
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
     Subjects and methods
     Results
     Discussion
     Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed97    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded14    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal