Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine

CASE REPORT
Year
: 2011  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 199--202

A cross-cultural comparison of objectivity in childhood games: Iran and the United States


Ali Rastegarpour 
 Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Ali Rastegarpour
Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, #23 Paidarfard St., Boostan 9 Street, Pasdaran Ave., Tehran 16666
Iran

Games have been introduced as a means for studying cross-cultural differences and societies. This paper presents a case study in analogous games played by children in two different countries with two different cultures - Iran and the United States. Four examples are presented to demonstrate that games played by Iranian children are subject to less objectivity in their rules. Therefore, nonobjectivity may be a phenomenon that has roots in the society and the many differences between the two societies may very well be the results of this fundamental difference. If the presence of objectivity in childhood game rules could be, in actuality, indicative of objectivity in social and civil interactions in the everyday lives of the people, the direction of causality remains to be established. In other words, it remains unclear whether the games influence the culture or are influenced by the mandates of the society.


How to cite this article:
Rastegarpour A. A cross-cultural comparison of objectivity in childhood games: Iran and the United States.Indian J Psychol Med 2011;33:199-202


How to cite this URL:
Rastegarpour A. A cross-cultural comparison of objectivity in childhood games: Iran and the United States. Indian J Psychol Med [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Apr 10 ];33:199-202
Available from: http://www.ijpm.info/article.asp?issn=0253-7176;year=2011;volume=33;issue=2;spage=199;epage=202;aulast=Rastegarpour;type=0