LETTERS TO EDITOR
Year : 2018 | Volume
: 40 | Issue : 4 | Page : 391--392
A comment on “blue whale challenge: Perceptions of first responders in medical profession”
Soumitra Das, Guru S Gowda
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Dr. Guru S Gowda
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru - 560 029, Karnataka
|How to cite this article:|
Das S, Gowda GS. A comment on “blue whale challenge: Perceptions of first responders in medical profession”.Indian J Psychol Med 2018;40:391-392
|How to cite this URL:|
Das S, Gowda GS. A comment on “blue whale challenge: Perceptions of first responders in medical profession”. Indian J Psychol Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Jan 17 ];40:391-392
Available from: http://www.ijpm.info/text.asp?2018/40/4/391/234791
This correspondence is made in response to the original article titled “blue whale challenge: perceptions of the first responders in medical profession” by Mahadevaiah and Nayak. This aspect, which could be an eye-opener on adolescent suicidality, is studied for the first time. Blue whale game itself is a much-hyped internet sensation. Author has mentioned about its fatality; however, in reality, there is not a single case of suicide due to the Blue whale game. No authority has established causation. Even before, there were various suicidal phenomena such as “copycat suicide”, “Wertheim's phenomenon” etc., which never got such hype even though those needed much more attention., The point is that any internet game showing violent content might incite homicidal or suicidal behavior where the game is not the culprit as it seems; however, the personality, vulnerability, and psychopathology are the most important concerns.
Mahadevaiah and Nayak  presented the findings of a survey among medical professionals on perceptions of responders on blue whale challenge. They included clinical psychologists in the convenient telephonic survey and considered them as medical professionals, which is quite unusual because they are not considered as medical professionals by the Medical Council of India. Mixing up medical professionals and clinical psychologists in a survey bring up heterogeneity. The only other groups they included in the survey were psychiatrists and pediatricians. Hence, neither did they specify in the title that they have included only two kinds of specialists nor did they include other medical professionals such as general surgeons, orthopedic surgeons or dermatologists to call the sample the broad rubric of the “medical profession”. Moreover, surgical professionals might get more cases of children with suicidality due to self-inflicted injuries related to blue whale challenge game, who might not even attend pediatricians or psychiatrists because of stigma, poor reference system, and poor awareness among doctors and patients.
The medical professionals' age and workplace and the locality of a patient who seeks clinical services may be very important factors. The blue whale is an internet game, so internet availability and use are important factors. The whole survey missed these important aspects. In the methodology section, the authors mentioned about the qualitative analysis. We did not find any narrative, ethnographic, phenomenological, grounded theory or case study model of qualitative analysis in the results or discussion part of the study. Assessing the level of knowledge among professionals, through questionnaires, cannot be considered qualitative research.
There is no difference between “description of the game” and “identifying the children” which are mere repetitions of different stages of the game. There are many awareness campaigns conducted government authorities like Ministry of Electronic and Information Technology  and National Commission for Protection of Child Right  and nongovernment organizations like UNICEF  which were not described by the authors. The effort of the authors is commendable, but they could have made the study more systematic and methodological with the help of a well-conducted survey manual.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
|1||Mahadevaiah M, Nayak RB. Blue whale challenge: Perceptions of first responders in medical profession. Indian J Psychol Med 2018;40:178-82.|
|2||Mesoudi A. The cultural dynamics of copycat suicide. PLoS One 2009;4:e7252.|
|3||Niederkrotenthaler T, Herberth A, Sonnec G. The “Werther-effect”: Legend or reality? Neuropsychiatr 2007;21:284-90.|
|4||ADVISORY ON “BLUE WHALE CHALLENGE GAME”,Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India [Internet]. Available from: http://meity.gov.in/advisory-blue-whale-challenge-game. [Last cited on 2018 Apr 04].|
|5||Available from: http://www.ncpcr.gov.in/showfile.php?lan g=1&level=1&sublinkid=1267&lid=1499 [Last cited and accessed on 2018 Apr 04].|
|6||Available from: http://unicef.in/Uploads/Publications/Resources/pub_doc148.pdf [Last cited and accessed on 2018 Apr 04].|